Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Anytime Optimal Decision Tree Learning with Continuous Features

About

In recent years, significant progress has been made on algorithms for learning optimal decision trees, primarily in the context of binary features. Extending these methods to continuous features remains substantially more challenging due to the large number of potential splits for each feature. Recently, an elegant exact algorithm was proposed for learning optimal decision trees with continuous features; however, the rapidly increasing computational time limits its practical applicability to shallow depths (typically 3 or 4). It relies on a depth-first search optimization strategy that fully optimizes the left subtree of each split before exploring the corresponding right subtree. While effective in finding optimal solutions given sufficient time, this strategy can lead to poor anytime behavior: when interrupted early, the best-found tree is often highly unbalanced and suboptimal. In such cases, purely greedy methods such as C4.5 may, paradoxically, yield better solutions. To address this limitation, we propose an anytime, yet complete approach leveraging limited discrepancy search, distributing the computational effort more evenly across the entire tree structure, and thus ensuring that a high-quality decision tree is available at any interruption point. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms the existing one in terms of anytime performance.

Harold Kiossou, Pierre Schaus, Siegfried Nijssen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Classificationdry-bean (test)
Accuracy90.8
39
Decision Tree InductionUCI Machine Learning Repository 16 datasets (Average)
Average Primal Integral33.5
28
Decision Tree LearningUCI Machine Learning Repository Average of 16 datasets (train test)
Average Primal Integral40.2
28
ClassificationRaisin UCI (test)
Accuracy83.8
13
Classificationsegment UCI (test)
Accuracy94.7
12
Classificationskin UCI (test)
Accuracy99.7
11
ClassificationUCI Htru2 (test)
Accuracy97.6
9
Classificationavila UCI (test)
Accuracy70.9
6
Classificationmagic UCI (test)
Accuracy85.4
6
Classificationeeg UCI (test)
Accuracy78.5
6
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update