Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

EvoCUA: Evolving Computer Use Agents via Learning from Scalable Synthetic Experience

About

The development of native computer-use agents (CUA) represents a significant leap in multimodal AI. However, their potential is currently bottlenecked by the constraints of static data scaling. Existing paradigms relying primarily on passive imitation of static datasets struggle to capture the intricate causal dynamics inherent in long-horizon computer tasks. In this work, we introduce EvoCUA, a native computer use agentic model. Unlike static imitation, EvoCUA integrates data generation and policy optimization into a self-sustaining evolutionary cycle. To mitigate data scarcity, we develop a verifiable synthesis engine that autonomously generates diverse tasks coupled with executable validators. To enable large-scale experience acquisition, we design a scalable infrastructure orchestrating tens of thousands of asynchronous sandbox rollouts. Building on these massive trajectories, we propose an iterative evolving learning strategy to efficiently internalize this experience. This mechanism dynamically regulates policy updates by identifying capability boundaries -- reinforcing successful routines while transforming failure trajectories into rich supervision through error analysis and self-correction. Empirical evaluations on the OSWorld benchmark demonstrate that EvoCUA achieves a success rate of 56.7%, establishing a new open-source state-of-the-art. Notably, EvoCUA significantly outperforms the previous best open-source model, OpenCUA-72B (45.0%), and surpasses leading closed-weights models such as UI-TARS-2 (53.1%). Crucially, our results underscore the generalizability of this approach: the evolving paradigm driven by learning from experience yields consistent performance gains across foundation models of varying scales, establishing a robust and scalable path for advancing native agent capabilities.

Taofeng Xue, Chong Peng, Mianqiu Huang, Linsen Guo, Tiancheng Han, Haozhe Wang, Jianing Wang, Xiaocheng Zhang, Xin Yang, Dengchang Zhao, Jinrui Ding, Xiandi Ma, Yuchen Xie, Peng Pei, Xunliang Cai, Xipeng Qiu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
GUI GroundingScreenSpot v2
Avg Accuracy93.47
371
OCR EvaluationOCRBench
Score85.35
350
GUI GroundingScreenSpot Pro
Accuracy63.24
195
GUI GroundingOSWorld-G
Average Score67.65
144
Multimodal ReasoningMathVista
Accuracy80.4
72
GUI GroundingUI-Vision--
68
Computer UseOSWorld
OS Success Rate75
45
GUI NavigationOSWorld (Verified)
OS Success Rate78.26
32
GUI GroundingCUActSpot
GUI Accuracy28.9
21
GUI Agent Task CompletionOSWorld 1.0 (test)
Success Rate (GIMP)76.29
20
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update