Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

DREAM: Dual-Standard Semantic Homogeneity with Dynamic Optimization for Graph Learning with Label Noise

About

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been widely used in various graph machine learning scenarios. Existing literature primarily assumes well-annotated training graphs, while the reliability of labels is not guaranteed in real-world scenarios. Recently, efforts have been made to address the problem of graph learning with label noise. However, existing methods often (i) struggle to distinguish between reliable and unreliable nodes, and (ii) overlook the relational information embedded in the graph topology. To tackle this problem, this paper proposes a novel method, Dual-Standard Semantic Homogeneity with Dynamic Optimization (DREAM), for reliable, relation-informed optimization on graphs with label noise. Specifically, we design a relation-informed dynamic optimization framework that iteratively reevaluates the reliability of each labeled node in the graph during the optimization process according to the relation of the target node and other nodes. To measure this relation comprehensively, we propose a dual-standard selection strategy that selects a set of anchor nodes based on both node proximity and graph topology. Subsequently, we compute the semantic homogeneity between the target node and the anchor nodes, which serves as guidance for optimization. We also provide a rigorous theoretical analysis to justify the design of DREAM. Extensive experiments are performed on six graph datasets across various domains under three types of graph label noise against competing baselines, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DREAM.

Yusheng Zhao, Jiaye Xie, Qixin Zhang, Weizhi Zhang, Xiao Luo, Zhiping Xiao, Philip S. Yu, Ming Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy80.4
951
Node ClassificationDBLP (test)--
86
Node ClassificationFlickr (test)
Accuracy53.84
79
Node ClassificationPubMed (test)
Accuracy72.45
20
Node ClassificationA-Photo (test)
Accuracy89.19
16
Node ClassificationPubmed
Training Time per Epoch (s)19.4
13
Graph Node ClassificationCora
Average training time (s)3.66
5
Graph Node ClassificationCiteseer
Training Time (s)4.17
5
Graph Node ClassificationA-Photo
Avg Training Time (s)6.84
5
Graph Node ClassificationFlickr
Training Time (s)12.45
5
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update