Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

A Unified SPD Token Transformer Framework for EEG Classification: Systematic Comparison of Geometric Embeddings

About

Spatial covariance matrices of EEG signals are Symmetric Positive Definite (SPD) and lie on a Riemannian manifold, yet the theoretical connection between embedding geometry and optimization dynamics remains unexplored. We provide a formal analysis linking embedding choice to gradient conditioning and numerical stability for SPD manifolds, establishing three theoretical results: (1) BWSPD's $\sqrt{\kappa}$ gradient conditioning (vs $\kappa$ for Log-Euclidean) via Daleckii-Kre\u{\i}n matrices provides better gradient conditioning on high-dimensional inputs ($d \geq 22$), with this advantage reducing on low-dimensional inputs ($d \leq 8$) where eigendecomposition overhead dominates; (2) Embedding-Space Batch Normalization (BN-Embed) approximates Riemannian normalization up to $O(\varepsilon^2)$ error, yielding $+26\%$ accuracy on 56-channel ERP data but negligible effect on 8-channel SSVEP data, matching the channel-count-dependent prediction; (3) bi-Lipschitz bounds prove BWSPD tokens preserve manifold distances with distortion governed solely by the condition ratio $\kappa$. We validate these predictions via a unified Transformer framework comparing BWSPD, Log-Euclidean, and Euclidean embeddings within identical architecture across 1,500+ runs on three EEG paradigms (motor imagery, ERP, SSVEP; 36 subjects). Our Log-Euclidean Transformer achieves state-of-the-art performance on all datasets, substantially outperforming classical Riemannian classifiers and recent SPD baselines, while BWSPD offers competitive accuracy with similar training time.

Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo, Guan-Ying Chen, Xinyu Zhang, Fan Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
EEG ClassificationEEG Classification
Forward Latency (ms)2.85
8
EEG ClassificationBCI2a LOSO (test)
Mean Test Accuracy34.02
5
EEG ClassificationBCIcha LOSO (test)
Mean Test Accuracy72.85
5
EEG ClassificationMAMEM LOSO (test)
Mean Accuracy20.89
5
EEG ClassificationBCI2a (S1)
Accuracy91.51
5
EEG ClassificationMAMEM (S1)
Accuracy99.43
5
EEG ClassificationBCIcha (S2)
Accuracy88.02
5
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update