A Unified SPD Token Transformer Framework for EEG Classification: Systematic Comparison of Geometric Embeddings
About
Spatial covariance matrices of EEG signals are Symmetric Positive Definite (SPD) and lie on a Riemannian manifold, yet the theoretical connection between embedding geometry and optimization dynamics remains unexplored. We provide a formal analysis linking embedding choice to gradient conditioning and numerical stability for SPD manifolds, establishing three theoretical results: (1) BWSPD's $\sqrt{\kappa}$ gradient conditioning (vs $\kappa$ for Log-Euclidean) via Daleckii-Kre\u{\i}n matrices provides better gradient conditioning on high-dimensional inputs ($d \geq 22$), with this advantage reducing on low-dimensional inputs ($d \leq 8$) where eigendecomposition overhead dominates; (2) Embedding-Space Batch Normalization (BN-Embed) approximates Riemannian normalization up to $O(\varepsilon^2)$ error, yielding $+26\%$ accuracy on 56-channel ERP data but negligible effect on 8-channel SSVEP data, matching the channel-count-dependent prediction; (3) bi-Lipschitz bounds prove BWSPD tokens preserve manifold distances with distortion governed solely by the condition ratio $\kappa$. We validate these predictions via a unified Transformer framework comparing BWSPD, Log-Euclidean, and Euclidean embeddings within identical architecture across 1,500+ runs on three EEG paradigms (motor imagery, ERP, SSVEP; 36 subjects). Our Log-Euclidean Transformer achieves state-of-the-art performance on all datasets, substantially outperforming classical Riemannian classifiers and recent SPD baselines, while BWSPD offers competitive accuracy with similar training time.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEG Classification | EEG Classification | Forward Latency (ms)2.85 | 8 | |
| EEG Classification | BCI2a LOSO (test) | Mean Test Accuracy34.02 | 5 | |
| EEG Classification | BCIcha LOSO (test) | Mean Test Accuracy72.85 | 5 | |
| EEG Classification | MAMEM LOSO (test) | Mean Accuracy20.89 | 5 | |
| EEG Classification | BCI2a (S1) | Accuracy91.51 | 5 | |
| EEG Classification | MAMEM (S1) | Accuracy99.43 | 5 | |
| EEG Classification | BCIcha (S2) | Accuracy88.02 | 5 |