Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Weak Diffusion Priors Can Still Achieve Strong Inverse-Problem Performance

About

Can a diffusion model trained on bedrooms recover human faces? Diffusion models are widely used as priors for inverse problems, but standard approaches usually assume a high-fidelity model trained on data that closely match the unknown signal. In practice, one often must use a mismatched or low-fidelity diffusion prior. Surprisingly, these weak priors often perform nearly as well as full-strength, in-domain baselines. We study when and why inverse solvers are robust to weak diffusion priors. Through extensive experiments, we find that weak priors succeed when measurements are highly informative (e.g., many observed pixels), and we identify regimes where they fail. To explain this behavior, we combine Bayesian-consistency theory with local-correlation analysis: the theory gives conditions under which high-dimensional measurements make the posterior concentrate near the true signal, while the correlation analysis shows that weak and stronger natural-image priors can share similar local spatial structure. These results provide a principled justification on when weak diffusion priors can be used reliably. Code is available at https://github.com/jjia131/weak-diffusion-priors-inverse-problem.

Jing Jia, Wei Yuan, Sifan Liu, Liyue Shen, Guanyang Wang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
InpaintingCelebA
PSNR33.784
49
Gaussian DeblurringCelebA
PSNR29.98
35
Super-ResolutionCelebA--
24
Super-Resolution (4x)CelebA
PSNR31.271
16
Image InpaintingImageNet (test)
PSNR28.44
15
Gaussian DeblurringBedroom
PSNR25.28
6
Gaussian DeblurringChurch
PSNR22.43
6
InpaintingBedroom
PSNR28.883
6
Nonlinear DeblurringCelebA
PSNR25.21
6
Nonlinear DeblurringBedroom
PSNR22.67
6
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update