Learning Geometrically-Grounded 3D Visual Representations for View-Generalizable Robotic Manipulation
About
Real-world robotic manipulation demands visuomotor policies capable of robust spatial scene understanding and strong generalization across diverse camera viewpoints. While recent advances in 3D-aware visual representations have shown promise, they still suffer from several key limitations, including reliance on multi-view observations during inference which is impractical in single-view restricted scenarios, incomplete scene modeling that fails to capture holistic and fine-grained geometric structures essential for precise manipulation, and lack of effective policy training strategies to retain and exploit the acquired 3D knowledge. To address these challenges, we present MethodName, a unified representation-policy learning framework for view-generalizable robotic manipulation. MethodName introduces a single-view 3D pretraining paradigm that leverages point cloud reconstruction and feed-forward gaussian splatting under multi-view supervision to learn holistic geometric representations. During policy learning, MethodName performs multi-step distillation to preserve the pretrained geometric understanding and effectively transfer it to manipulation skills. We conduct experiments on 12 RLBench tasks, where our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art method by 12.7% in average success rate. Further evaluation on six representative tasks demonstrates strong zero-shot view generalization, with success rate drops of only 22.0% and 29.7% under moderate and large viewpoint shifts respectively, whereas the state-of-the-art method suffers larger decreases of 41.6% and 51.5%.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic Manipulation | RLBench (test) | Average Success Rate44.2 | 34 | |
| Robot Manipulation | RLBench Moderate Shift | Average Success Rate41.2 | 11 | |
| Robot Manipulation | RLBench Large Shift | Rel. Drop (Avg)3.7 | 10 | |
| Robot Manipulation | RLBench Large Shift (test) | Average SR39.6 | 8 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | RLBench Moderate Shift (test) | Success Rate45.9 | 4 | |
| Robot Manipulation | RLBench View (train) | SR (Avg)52.9 | 3 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | RLBench Multi-task Train View | Relative Performance Drop1.7 | 3 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | RLBench Multi-task Moderate Shift | Relative Performance Drop6.9 | 3 |