Online Conformal Prediction via Universal Portfolio Algorithms
About
Online conformal prediction (OCP) seeks prediction intervals that achieve long-run $1-\alpha$ coverage for arbitrary (possibly adversarial) data streams, while remaining as informative as possible. Existing OCP methods often require manual learning-rate tuning to work well, and may also require algorithm-specific analyses. Here, we develop a general regret-to-coverage theory for interval-valued OCP based on the $(1-\alpha)$-pinball loss. Our first contribution is to identify \emph{linearized regret} as a key notion, showing that controlling it implies coverage bounds for any online algorithm. This relies on a black-box reduction that depends only on the Fenchel conjugate of an upper bound on the linearized regret. Building on this theory, we propose UP-OCP, a parameter-free method for OCP, via a reduction to a two-asset portfolio selection problem, leveraging universal portfolio algorithms. We show strong finite-time bounds on the miscoverage of UP-OCP, even for polynomially growing predictions. Extensive experiments support that UP-OCP delivers consistently better size/coverage trade-offs than prior online conformal baselines.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Conformal Prediction | Stationary Dataset synthetic | Marginal Coverage95.2 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | Mix Dataset synthetic s (test) | Marginal Coverage95.1 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | AMZN | Marginal Coverage93.1 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | Electricity Demand | Marginal Coverage93.3 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | GOOGL (test) | Marginal Coverage93.2 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | Sinusoid Dataset synthetic | Marginal Coverage93.1 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | AXP | Marginal Coverage93.2 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | AAPL | Marginal Coverage93.2 | 6 | |
| Online Conformal Prediction | AXP (test) | Marginal Coverage93.2 | 4 |