From Single Scan to Sequential Consistency: A New Paradigm for LIDAR Relocalization
About
LiDAR relocalization aims to estimate the global 6-DoF pose of a sensor in the environment. However, existing regression-based approaches are prone to dynamic or ambiguous scenarios, as they either solely rely on single-frame inference or neglect the spatio-temporal consistency across scans. In this paper, we propose TempLoc, a new LiDAR relocalization framework that enhances the robustness of localization by effectively modeling sequential consistency. Specifically, a Global Coordinate Estimation module is first introduced to predict point-wise global coordinates and associated uncertainties for each LiDAR scan. A Prior Coordinate Generation module is then presented to estimate inter-frame point correspondences by the attention mechanism. Lastly, an Uncertainty-Guided Coordinate Fusion module is deployed to integrate both predictions of point correspondence in an end-to-end fashion, yielding a more temporally consistent and accurate global 6-DoF pose. Experimental results on the NCLT and Oxford Robot-Car benchmarks show that our TempLoc outperforms stateof-the-art methods by a large margin, demonstrating the effectiveness of temporal-aware correspondence modeling in LiDAR relocalization. Our code will be released soon.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiDAR Localization | QEOxford Average | Mean Position (m)0.72 | 23 | |
| LiDAR Localization | Oxford (15-13-06-37) | Mean Position Error (m)0.74 | 23 | |
| LiDAR Localization | Oxford (17-13-26-39) | Mean Position Error (m)0.77 | 23 | |
| LiDAR Localization | Oxford (17-14-03-00) | Mean Position Error (m)0.6 | 23 | |
| LiDAR relocalization | Oxford (test) | Translation Error (Seq 15-13-06-37)2.22 | 12 | |
| LiDAR relocalization | QEOxford (18-14-14-42) | Avg Translation Error (m)0.77 | 11 | |
| LiDAR relocalization | NCLT map: 2012-02-18, query: 2012-05-26 (test) | Recall@1 (<5m)98.3 | 3 |