Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

$V_0$: A Generalist Value Model for Any Policy at State Zero

About

Policy gradient methods rely on a baseline to measure the relative advantage of an action, ensuring the model reinforces behaviors that outperform its current average capability. In the training of Large Language Models (LLMs) using Actor-Critic methods (e.g., PPO), this baseline is typically estimated by a Value Model (Critic) often as large as the policy model itself. However, as the policy continuously evolves, the value model requires expensive, synchronous incremental training to accurately track the shifting capabilities of the policy. To avoid this overhead, Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) eliminates the coupled value model by using the average reward of a group of rollouts as the baseline; yet, this approach necessitates extensive sampling to maintain estimation stability. In this paper, we propose $V_0$, a Generalist Value Model capable of estimating the expected performance of any model on unseen prompts without requiring parameter updates. We reframe value estimation by treating the policy's dynamic capability as an explicit context input; specifically, we leverage a history of instruction-performance pairs to dynamically profile the model, departing from the traditional paradigm that relies on parameter fitting to perceive capability shifts. Focusing on value estimation at State Zero (i.e., the initial prompt, hence $V_0$), our model serves as a critical resource scheduler. During GRPO training, $V_0$ predicts success rates prior to rollout, allowing for efficient sampling budget allocation; during deployment, it functions as a router, dispatching instructions to the most cost-effective and suitable model. Empirical results demonstrate that $V_0$ significantly outperforms heuristic budget allocation and achieves a Pareto-optimal trade-off between performance and cost in LLM routing tasks.

Yi-Kai Zhang, Zhiyuan Yao, Hongyan Hao, Yueqing Sun, Qi Gu, Hui Su, Xunliang Cai, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy50.21
251
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2025
Accuracy36.56
227
Mathematical ReasoningAMC 23
Accuracy89.84
198
Mathematical ReasoningOlympiadBench
Accuracy0.5634
34
Value ModelingDAPO-Math-17k DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B policy (Held-out)
Intra AUC71
2
Value ModelingDAPO-Math-17k Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 policy (Held-out)
Intra AUC0.689
2
Value ModelingDAPO-Math-17k Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct policy (Held-out)
Intra AUC0.693
2
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update