A Fast and Generalizable Fourier Neural Operator-Based Surrogate for Melt-Pool Prediction in Laser Processing
About
High-fidelity simulations of laser welding capture complex thermo-fluid phenomena, including phase change, free-surface deformation, and keyhole dynamics, however their computational cost limits large-scale process exploration and real-time use. In this work we present the Laser Processing Fourier Neural Operator (LP-FNO), a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) based surrogate model that learns the parametric solution operator of various laser processes from multiphysics simulations generated with FLOW-3D WELD (registered trademark). Through a novel approach of reformulating the transient problem in the moving laser frame and applying temporal averaging, the system results in a quasi-steady state setting suitable for operator learning, even in the keyhole welding regime. The proposed LP-FNO maps process parameters to three-dimensional temperature fields and melt-pool boundaries across a broad process window spanning conduction and keyhole regimes using the non-dimensional normalized enthalpy formulation. The model achieves temperature prediction errors on the order of 1% and intersection-over-union scores for melt-pool segmentation over 0.9. We demonstrate that a LP-FNO model trained on coarse-resolution data can be evaluated on finer grids, yielding accurate super-resolved predictions in mesh-converged conduction regimes, whereas discrepancies in keyhole regimes reflect unresolved dynamics in the coarse-mesh training data. These results indicate that the LP-FNO provides an efficient surrogate modeling framework for laser welding, enabling prediction of full three-dimensional fields and phase interfaces over wide parameter ranges in just tens of milliseconds, up to a hundred thousand times faster than traditional Finite Volume multi-physics software.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computational Runtime | Transient LPBF Simulation Power 50W, Scan speed 0.260 m/s, Scan distance 0.6 mm | Runtime0.01 | 5 | |
| Melt-pool prediction | LPBF 10um mesh simulation 1.0 (8-fold cross-validation test) | MAE0.0024 | 1 | |
| Melt-pool prediction | FLOW-3D WELD 5 µm mesh super-resolved (test) | MAE0.0081 | 1 | |
| Metal-Gas interface prediction | LPBF 10um mesh simulation 8-fold cross-validation 1.0 (test) | Abs. Mean Error0.0035 | 1 | |
| Metal-Gas interface prediction | FLOW-3D WELD super-resolved 5 µm mesh (test) | MAE0.004 | 1 | |
| Temperature Field Prediction | FLOW-3D WELD super-resolved 5 µm mesh (test) | Abs. Mean Error31.8 | 1 | |
| Temperature Prediction | LPBF 10um mesh simulation 8-fold cross-validation 1.0 (test) | MAE18.3 | 1 |