OmniVL-Guard: Towards Unified Vision-Language Forgery Detection and Grounding via Balanced RL
About
Existing forgery detection methods are often limited to uni-modal or bi-modal settings, failing to handle the interleaved text, images, and videos prevalent in real-world misinformation. To bridge this gap, this paper targets to develop a unified framework for omnibus vision-language forgery detection and grounding. In this unified setting, the {interplay} between diverse modalities and the dual requirements of simultaneous detection and localization pose a critical ``difficulty bias`` problem: the simpler veracity classification task tends to dominate the gradients, leading to suboptimal performance in fine-grained grounding during multi-task optimization. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{OmniVL-Guard}, a balanced reinforcement learning framework for omnibus vision-language forgery detection and grounding. Particularly, OmniVL-Guard comprises two core designs: Self-Evolving CoT Generatio and Adaptive Reward Scaling Policy Optimization (ARSPO). {Self-Evolving CoT Generation} synthesizes high-quality reasoning paths, effectively overcoming the cold-start challenge. Building upon this, {Adaptive Reward Scaling Policy Optimization (ARSPO)} dynamically modulates reward scales and task weights, ensuring a balanced joint optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OmniVL-Guard significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods and exhibits zero-shot robust generalization across out-of-domain scenarios.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binary Classification | FSFR | Accuracy90.85 | 7 | |
| Image Localization | FSFR | Localization Score0.5426 | 7 | |
| Text Localization | FSFR | Localization Score63.78 | 7 | |
| Text Localization | Dt In-Domain (test) | F1 Score63.78 | 7 | |
| Video Localization | FSFR | Localization Score59.22 | 7 | |
| Binary Classification | MMFakeBench text-image (Out-Of-Domain) | Accuracy79.38 | 6 | |
| Binary Classification | Dt In-Domain Text-Image (test) | Accuracy75.52 | 6 | |
| Binary Classification | ISOT text (Out-Of-Domain) | Accuracy93.69 | 5 | |
| Binary Classification | CASIA2.0 image (Out-Of-Domain) | Accuracy0.6364 | 5 | |
| Binary Classification | FakeSV text-video (Out-Of-Domain) | Accuracy63.55 | 5 |