Towards On-Policy SFT: Distribution Discriminant Theory and its Applications in LLM Training
About
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is computationally efficient but often yields inferior generalization compared to reinforcement learning (RL). This gap is primarily driven by RL's use of on-policy data. We propose a framework to bridge this chasm by enabling On-Policy SFT. We first present \textbf{\textit{Distribution Discriminant Theory (DDT)}}, which explains and quantifies the alignment between data and the model-induced distribution. Leveraging DDT, we introduce two complementary techniques: (i) \textbf{\textit{In-Distribution Finetuning (IDFT)}}, a loss-level method to enhance generalization ability of SFT, and (ii) \textbf{\textit{Hinted Decoding}}, a data-level technique that can re-align the training corpus to the model's distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves generalization performance surpassing prominent offline RL algorithms, including DPO and SimPO, while maintaining the efficiency of an SFT pipeline. The proposed framework thus offers a practical alternative in domains where RL is infeasible. We open-source the code here: https://github.com/zhangmiaosen2000/Towards-On-Policy-SFT
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Question Answering | MedMCQA | Accuracy35.12 | 591 | |
| Medical Question Answering | MedQA | Accuracy32.44 | 179 | |
| Code Generation | HumanEval+ | Pass@171.34 | 122 | |
| Medical Question Answering | MMLU Med | Accuracy38.23 | 111 | |
| Common Sense Reasoning | ARC Challenge | Accuracy88.9 | 63 | |
| Commonsense Reasoning | Commonsense Reasoning | Accuracy81.4 | 57 | |
| Code Generation | MBPP | Pass@1 Accuracy57.4 | 55 | |
| Code Generation | LCB v6 | Pass@115.45 | 48 | |
| Code Generation | MBPP+ | Pass@165.87 | 48 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME24 | Avg@167.5 | 45 |