Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Towards explainable reference-free speech intelligibility evaluation of people with pathological speech

About

Objective assessment of speech that reflects meaningful changes in communication is crucial for clinical decision making and reproducible research. While existing objective assessments, particularly reference-based approaches, can capture intelligibility changes, they are often hindered by lack of explainability and the need for labor-intensive manual transcriptions. To address these issues, this work proposes the reference-free, explainable ASR Inconsistency Score. We evaluate this method on pathological speech in Dutch, Spanish and English, and compare its performance to a reference-based Word Error Rate (WER) baseline. Our results demonstrate that the ASR Inconsistency Score achieves a high correlation with expert perceptual ratings, with performance closely matching, and in one case exceeding, a standard reference-based Word Error Rate (WER) baseline.

Bence Mark Halpern, Thomas Tienkamp, Defne Abur, Tomoki Toda• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Intelligibility EstimationNKI-OC-VC
Pearson Correlation (r)-0.8617
4
Intelligibility EstimationNKI-SpeechRT
Pearson's r-0.7625
4
Intelligibility EstimationTORGO
Pearson Correlation (r)-0.8361
4
Intelligibility EstimationNeuroVoz
Pearson Correlation (r)-0.8879
4
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update