Reliable Thinking with Images
About
As a multimodal extension of Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Thinking with Images (TWI) has recently emerged as a promising avenue to enhance the reasoning capability of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which generates interleaved CoT by incorporating visual cues into the textual reasoning process. However, the success of existing TWI methods heavily relies on the assumption that interleaved image-text CoTs are faultless, which is easily violated in real-world scenarios due to the complexity of multimodal understanding. In this paper, we reveal and study a highly-practical yet under-explored problem in TWI, termed Noisy Thinking (NT). Specifically, NT refers to the imperfect visual cues mining and answer reasoning process. As the saying goes, ``One mistake leads to another'', erroneous interleaved CoT would cause error accumulation, thus significantly degrading the performance of MLLMs. To solve the NT problem, we propose a novel method dubbed Reliable Thinking with Images (RTWI). In brief, RTWI estimates the reliability of visual cues and textual CoT in a unified text-centric manner and accordingly employs robust filtering and voting modules to prevent NT from contaminating the final answer. Extensive experiments on seven benchmarks verify the effectiveness of RTWI against NT.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Reasoning | V*Bench | Accuracy87 | 58 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MathVision (test) | Accuracy25.5 | 41 | |
| High-resolution Visual Understanding | HR-Bench-8K | FSP95 | 29 | |
| Visual Reasoning | HR-Bench 4K FSP | ACC96.5 | 29 | |
| Multimodal Reasoning | LogicVista | Accuracy61.7 | 24 | |
| High-Resolution Multimodal Reasoning | HR-Bench 4K FCP | ACC78.3 | 19 | |
| High-Resolution Multimodal Reasoning | HR-Bench 8K FSP | ACC94.8 | 19 | |
| High-Resolution Multimodal Reasoning | HR-Bench 8K FCP | Accuracy77 | 19 | |
| Multimodal Reasoning | Vstar Bench Attr | ACC94.8 | 19 | |
| Multimodal Reasoning | Vstar Bench Spatial | Accuracy90.8 | 19 |