Dynamic Delayed Tree Expansion For Improved Multi-Path Speculative Decoding
About
Multi-path speculative decoding accelerates lossless sampling from a target model by using a cheaper draft model to generate a draft tree of tokens, and then applies a verification algorithm that accepts a subset of these. While prior work has proposed various verification algorithms for i.i.d rollouts, their relative performance under matched settings remains unclear. In this work, we firstly present a systematic evaluation of verification strategies across model families, tasks, and sampling regimes, and find that Traversal Verification dominates consistently, with OT-based methods lagging far behind. Our analysis uncovers that this occurs because OT-based methods achieve high multi-token acceptance near the root of the draft tree, while multi-token gains are most impactful deeper in the draft tree, where draft and target distributions diverge. Based on this insight, we propose delayed tree expansion, which drafts a partial single path, delaying the i.i.d. branching point. We show that delayed tree expansion preserves the target distribution and improves on root-node i.i.d rollouts. Further, we develop a dynamic neural selector that estimates the expected block efficiency of optimal-transport-based verification methods from draft and target features, enabling context-dependent expansion decisions. Our neural selector allows OT-based methods like SpecInfer to outperform Traversal Verification for the first time, achieving 5% higher average throughput across a wide range of models, datasets, and sampling settings.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-path speculative decoding | held-out (test) | Average Block Efficiency6.84 | 24 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Qwen (test) | Throughput (tokens/s)22.54 | 6 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Gemma (test) | Throughput (tokens/s)13.26 | 6 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Average across models (Qwen, Gemma, Llama) (test) | Throughput (tokens/s)16.69 | 6 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Llama (test) | Throughput (tokens/s)14.27 | 6 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Qwen held-out (test) | Throughput Ratio Improvement1.31 | 5 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Gemma held-out (test) | Throughput Ratio Improvement2.17 | 5 | |
| Multi-path speculative decoding | Llama (held-out test) | Throughput Ratio Improvement1.21 | 5 |