Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

PenTiDef: Enhancing Privacy and Robustness in Decentralized Federated Intrusion Detection Systems against Poisoning Attacks

About

The increasing deployment of Federated Learning (FL) in Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) introduces new challenges related to data privacy, centralized coordination, and susceptibility to poisoning attacks. While significant research has focused on protecting traditional FL-IDS with centralized aggregation servers, there remains a notable gap in addressing the unique challenges of decentralized FL-IDS (DFL-IDS). This study aims to address the limitations of traditional centralized FL-IDS by proposing a novel defense framework tailored for the decentralized FL-IDS architecture, with a focus on privacy preservation and robustness against poisoning attacks. We propose PenTiDef, a privacy-preserving and robust defense framework for DFL-IDS, which incorporates Distributed Differential Privacy (DDP) to protect data confidentiality and utilizes latent space representations (LSR) derived from neural networks to detect malicious updates in the decentralized model aggregation context. To eliminate single points of failure and enhance trust without a centralized aggregation server, PenTiDef employs a blockchain-based decentralized coordination mechanism that manages model aggregation, tracks update history, and supports trust enforcement through smart contracts. Experimental results on CIC-IDS2018 and Edge-IIoTSet demonstrate that PenTiDef consistently outperforms existing defenses (e.g., FLARE, FedCC) across various attack scenarios and data distributions. These findings highlight the potential of PenTiDef as a scalable and secure framework for deploying DFL-based IDS in adversarial environments. By leveraging privacy protection, malicious behavior detection in hidden data, and working without a central server, it provides a useful security solution against real-world attacks from untrust participants.

Phan The Duy, Nghi Hoang Khoa, Nguyen Tran Anh Quan, Luong Ha Tien, Ngo Duc Hoang Son, Van-Hau Pham• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Intrusion DetectionEdge-IIoTset
Accuracy95
84
Intrusion DetectionCIC-IDS 2018
Accuracy98
48
Targeted attack detectionCIC-IDS IID 2018
Accuracy97
48
Untargeted Attack DetectionCIC-IDS non-IID 2018
Accuracy95
48
Untargeted Attack DetectionEdge-IIoTset non-IID
Accuracy95
48
Intrusion DetectionEdge-IIoTset
Accuracy99
48
Targeted attack detectionCIC-IDS non-IID 10% Adversaries 2018
Detection Accuracy95
16
Targeted attack detectionEdge-IIoTset non-IID 10% Adversaries
Detection Rate95
16
Targeted attack detectionEdge-IIoTset non-IID, 20% Adversaries
Detection Performance94
16
Targeted attack detectionEdge-IIoTset non-IID 40% Adversaries
Detection Performance92
16
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update