Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

CLCR: Cross-Level Semantic Collaborative Representation for Multimodal Learning

About

Multimodal learning aims to capture both shared and private information from multiple modalities. However, existing methods that project all modalities into a single latent space for fusion often overlook the asynchronous, multi-level semantic structure of multimodal data. This oversight induces semantic misalignment and error propagation, thereby degrading representation quality. To address this issue, we propose Cross-Level Co-Representation (CLCR), which explicitly organizes each modality's features into a three-level semantic hierarchy and specifies level-wise constraints for cross-modal interactions. First, a semantic hierarchy encoder aligns shallow, mid, and deep features across modalities, establishing a common basis for interaction. And then, at each level, an Intra-Level Co-Exchange Domain (IntraCED) factorizes features into shared and private subspaces and restricts cross-modal attention to the shared subspace via a learnable token budget. This design ensures that only shared semantics are exchanged and prevents leakage from private channels. To integrate information across levels, the Inter-Level Co-Aggregation Domain (InterCAD) synchronizes semantic scales using learned anchors, selectively fuses the shared representations, and gates private cues to form a compact task representation. We further introduce regularization terms to enforce separation of shared and private features and to minimize cross-level interference. Experiments on six benchmarks spanning emotion recognition, event localization, sentiment analysis, and action recognition show that CLCR achieves strong performance and generalizes well across tasks.

Chunlei Meng, Guanhong Huang, Rong Fu, Runmin Jian, Zhongxue Gan, Chun Ouyang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multimodal Sentiment AnalysisCMU-MOSI
MAE0.678
59
Multimodal ClassificationCREMA-D
Accuracy77.92
12
Multimodal ClassificationKS
Accuracy75.41
12
Multimodal ClassificationAVE
Accuracy (%)73.82
12
Multimodal ClassificationUCF101
Accuracy0.8364
10
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Follow for update