Taming Preconditioner Drift: Unlocking the Potential of Second-Order Optimizers for Federated Learning on Non-IID Data
About
Second-order optimizers can significantly accelerate large-scale training, yet their naive federated variants are often unstable or even diverge on non-IID data. We show that a key culprit is \emph{preconditioner drift}: client-side second-order training induces heterogeneous \emph{curvature-defined geometries} (i.e., preconditioner coordinate systems), and server-side model averaging updates computed under incompatible metrics, corrupting the global descent direction. To address this geometric mismatch, we propose \texttt{FedPAC}, a \emph{preconditioner alignment and correction} framework for reliable federated second-order optimization. \texttt{FedPAC} explicitly decouples parameter aggregation from geometry synchronization by: (i) \textbf{Alignment} (i.e.,aggregating local preconditioners into a global reference and warm-starting clients via global preconditioner); and (ii) \textbf{Correction} (i.e., steering local preconditioned updates using a global preconditioned direction to suppress long-term drift). We provide drift-coupled non-convex convergence guarantees with linear speedup under partial participation. Empirically, \texttt{FedPAC} consistently improves stability and accuracy across vision and language tasks, achieving up to $5.8\%$ absolute accuracy gain on CIFAR-100 with ViTs. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FedPAC-8B24.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | Tiny ImageNet (test) | Accuracy87.92 | 265 | |
| Language Modeling | C4 | -- | 73 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 IID | Accuracy72.79 | 37 | |
| Image Classification | Tiny-ImageNet Dirichlet-0.05 (test) | Accuracy54 | 32 | |
| Image Classification | Tiny-ImageNet Dirichlet alpha=0.1 (test) | Test Accuracy57.95 | 30 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 Dir-0.1 | Accuracy71.85 | 28 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 Dirichlet-0.1 (test) | Accuracy71.85 | 20 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 Dirichlet-0.05 (test) | Accuracy65.56 | 20 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 Dir-0.05 | Accuracy65.56 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | Tiny-ImageNet Dir-0.1 | Accuracy57.95 | 12 |