Assessing the Impact of Speaker Identity in Speech Spoofing Detection
About
Spoofing detection systems are typically trained using diverse recordings from multiple speakers, often assuming that the resulting embeddings are independent of speaker identity. However, this assumption remains unverified. In this paper, we investigate the impact of speaker information on spoofing detection systems. We propose two approaches within our Speaker-Invariant Multi-Task framework, one that models speaker identity within the embeddings and another that removes it. SInMT integrates multi-task learning for joint speaker recognition and spoofing detection, incorporating a gradient reversal layer. Evaluated using four datasets, our speaker-invariant model reduces the average equal error rate by 17% compared to the baseline, with up to 48% reduction for the most challenging attacks (e.g., A11).
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spoofing Attack Detection | ASVspoof LA 2021 | EER7.35 | 37 | |
| Speech Spoofing Detection | In-the-Wild (ITW) (eval) | EER3.58 | 26 | |
| Anti-spoofing | Pooled | EER12.83 | 23 | |
| Spoofing Detection | ASVspoof 2019 (eval) | EER6.3 | 13 | |
| Spoofing Detection | ASVspoof DeepFake 2021 (test) | EER4.09 | 7 | |
| Spoofing Detection | DFADD (Evaluation) | EER2.3 | 7 | |
| Spoofing Detection | SONAR v1 (Evaluation) | EER20.97 | 7 | |
| Spoofing Detection | CodecFake v1 (Evaluation) | EER29.78 | 7 | |
| Spoofing Detection | FoR Fake-or-Real (evaluation) | EER10.07 | 7 | |
| Spoofing Detection | LibriSeVox v1 (test) | EER8.48 | 7 |