Global Prior Meets Local Consistency: Dual-Memory Augmented Vision-Language-Action Model for Efficient Robotic Manipulation
About
Hierarchical Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have rapidly become a dominant paradigm for robotic manipulation. It typically comprising a Vision-Language backbone for perception and understanding, together with a generative policy for action generation. However, its performance is increasingly bottlenecked by the action generation proceess. (i) Low inference efficiency. A pronounced distributional gap between isotropic noise priors and target action distributions, which increases denoising steps and the incidence of infeasible samples. (ii) Poor robustness. Existing policies condition solely on the current observation, neglecting the constraint of history sequence and thus lacking awareness of task progress and temporal consistency. To address these issues, we introduce OptimusVLA, a dual-memory VLA framework with Global Prior Memory (GPM) and Local Consistency Memory (LCM). GPM replaces Gaussian noise with task-level priors retrieved from semantically similar trajectories, thereby shortening the generative path and reducing the umber of function evaluations (NFE). LCM dynamically models executed action sequence to infer task progress and injects a learned consistency constraint that enforces temporal coherence and smoothness of trajectory. Across three simulation benchmarks, OptimusVLA consistently outperforms strong baselines: it achieves 98.6% average success rate on LIBERO, improves over pi_0 by 13.5% on CALVIN, and attains 38% average success rate on RoboTwin 2.0 Hard. In Real-World evaluation, OptimusVLA ranks best on Generalization and Long-horizon suites, surpassing pi_0 by 42.9% and 52.4%, respectively, while delivering 2.9x inference speedup.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot Manipulation | LIBERO | Goal Achievement98.4 | 494 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | Calvin ABCD→D | Success Rate (1 Inst)97.6 | 26 | |
| Average performance across tasks | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate (SR)38 | 7 | |
| Bimanual Manipulation | RoboTwin Hard Setting 2.0 (test) | Click Alarmclock SR31 | 7 | |
| Click Alarmclock | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate (SR)31 | 7 | |
| Click Bell | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate46 | 7 | |
| Open Laptop | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate (SR)0.48 | 7 | |
| Place Bread Skillet | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate4 | 7 | |
| Press Stapler | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate45 | 7 | |
| Stack Bowls Two | RoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 | Success Rate58 | 7 |