Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

REMIND: Rethinking Medical High-Modality Learning under Missingness--A Long-Tailed Distribution Perspective

About

Medical multi-modal learning is critical for integrating information from a large set of diverse modalities. However, when leveraging a high number of modalities in real clinical applications, it is often impractical to obtain full-modality observations for every patient due to data collection constraints, a problem we refer to as 'High-Modality Learning under Missingness'. In this study, we identify that such missingness inherently induces an exponential growth in possible modality combinations, followed by long-tail distributions of modality combinations due to varying modality availability. While prior work overlooked this critical phenomenon, we find this long-tailed distribution leads to significant underperformance on tail modality combination groups. Our empirical analysis attributes this problem to two fundamental issues: 1) gradient inconsistency, where tail groups' gradient updates diverge from the overall optimization direction; 2) concept shifts, where each modality combination requires distinct fusion functions. To address these challenges, we propose REMIND, a unified framework that REthinks MultImodal learNing under high-moDality missingness from a long-tail perspective. Our core idea is to propose a novel group-specialized Mixture-of-Experts architecture that scalably learns group-specific multi-modal fusion functions for arbitrary modality combinations, while simultaneously leveraging a group distributionally robust optimization strategy to upweight underrepresented modality combinations. Extensive experiments on real-world medical datasets show that our framework consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, and robustly generalizes across various medical multi-modal learning applications under high-modality missingness.

Chenwei Wu, Zitao Shuai, Liyue Shen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mortality PredictionMIMIC IV
Accuracy90.8
88
Mortality PredictionMIMIC IV
F1-score64.5
64
Breast density predictionEMBED
Accuracy84
56
ClassificationFPRM
Accuracy100
48
Eye Imaging ClassificationFPRM
F1 Score100
48
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Follow for update