AgilePruner: An Empirical Study of Attention and Diversity for Adaptive Visual Token Pruning in Large Vision-Language Models
About
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have adopted visual token pruning strategies to mitigate substantial computational overhead incurred by extensive visual token sequences. While prior works primarily focus on either attention-based or diversity-based pruning methods, in-depth analysis of these approaches' characteristics and limitations remains largely unexplored. In this work, we conduct thorough empirical analysis using effective rank (erank) as a measure of feature diversity and attention score entropy to investigate visual token processing mechanisms and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Our analysis reveals two insights: (1) Our erank-based quantitative analysis shows that many diversity-oriented pruning methods preserve substantially less feature diversity than intended; moreover, analysis using the CHAIR dataset reveals that the diversity they do retain is closely tied to increased hallucination frequency compared to attention-based pruning. (2) We further observe that attention-based approaches are more effective on simple images where visual evidence is concentrated, while diversity-based methods better handle complex images with distributed features. Building on these empirical insights, we show that incorporating image-aware adjustments into existing hybrid pruning strategies consistently improves their performance. We also provide a minimal instantiation of our empirical findings through a simple adaptive pruning mechanism, which achieves strong and reliable performance across standard benchmarks as well as hallucination-specific evaluations. Our project page available at https://cvsp-lab.github.io/AgilePruner.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Question Answering | VizWiz | Accuracy56 | 1525 | |
| Object Hallucination Evaluation | POPE | Accuracy87.4 | 1455 | |
| Visual Question Answering | VQA v2 | Accuracy76.4 | 1362 | |
| Visual Question Answering | TextVQA | Accuracy57 | 1285 | |
| Multimodal Evaluation | MME | Score1.75e+3 | 658 | |
| Chart Question Answering | ChartQA | -- | 356 | |
| Diagram Question Answering | AI2D | -- | 232 | |
| Visual Question Answering | GQA | Mean Accuracy59.4 | 196 | |
| Scientific Question Answering | ScienceQA image | Accuracy69 | 184 | |
| Multimodal Perception and Cognition | MME | Overall Score1.50e+3 | 182 |