Recursive Think-Answer Process for LLMs and VLMs
About
Think-Answer reasoners such as DeepSeek-R1 have made notable progress by leveraging interpretable internal reasoning. However, despite the frequent presence of self-reflective cues like "Oops!", they remain vulnerable to output errors during single-pass inference. To address this limitation, we propose an efficient Recursive Think-Answer Process (R-TAP) that enables models to engage in iterative reasoning cycles and generate more accurate answers, going beyond conventional single-pass approaches. Central to this approach is a confidence generator that evaluates the certainty of model responses and guides subsequent improvements. By incorporating two complementary rewards-Recursively Confidence Increase Reward and Final Answer Confidence Reward-we show that R-TAP-enhanced models consistently outperform conventional single-pass methods for both large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). Moreover, by analyzing the frequency of "Oops"-like expressions in model responses, we find that R-TAP-applied models exhibit significantly fewer self-reflective patterns, resulting in more stable and faster inference-time reasoning. We hope R-TAP pave the way evolving into efficient and elaborated methods to refine the reasoning processes of future AI.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Multimodal Reasoning | MathVerse | Accuracy61.8 | 221 | |
| Mathematical Multimodal Reasoning | MathVista | Accuracy80.2 | 218 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | Minerva Math | Accuracy43.8 | 186 | |
| Multimodal Math Reasoning | MathVision | Accuracy39.9 | 183 | |
| Multimodal Math Reasoning | WeMath | Accuracy79.3 | 168 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME 2024 (test) | Accuracy28.3 | 159 | |
| Mathematics | MATH 500 | Pass@197.3 | 95 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH500 | Accuracy83.5 | 82 | |
| Reading Comprehension | DROP | F1 Score84.5 | 73 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | OlympiadBench | Accuracy0.538 | 72 |