An Exploration-Analysis-Disambiguation Reasoning Framework for Word Sense Disambiguation with Low-Parameter LLMs
About
Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) remains a key challenge in Natural Language Processing (NLP), especially when dealing with rare or domain-specific senses that are often misinterpreted. While modern high-parameter Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4-Turbo have shown state-of-the-art WSD performance, their computational and energy demands limit scalability. This study investigates whether low-parameter LLMs (<4B parameters) can achieve comparable results through fine-tuning strategies that emphasize reasoning-driven sense identification. Using the FEWS dataset augmented with semi-automated, rationale-rich annotations, we fine-tune eight small-scale open-source LLMs (e.g. Gemma and Qwen). Our results reveal that Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-based reasoning combined with neighbour-word analysis achieves performance comparable to GPT-4-Turbo in zero-shot settings. Importantly, Gemma-3-4B and Qwen-3-4B models consistently outperform all medium-parameter baselines and state-of-the-art models on FEWS, with robust generalization to unseen senses. Furthermore, evaluation on the unseen "Fool Me If You Can'' dataset confirms strong cross-domain adaptability without task-specific fine-tuning. This work demonstrates that with carefully crafted reasoning-centric fine-tuning, low-parameter LLMs can deliver accurate WSD while substantially reducing computational and energy demands.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Word Sense Disambiguation | 42D | F1 Score78.48 | 19 | |
| Word Sense Disambiguation | hardEN | F1 Score54.19 | 19 | |
| Word Sense Disambiguation | FEWS (test) | F1 Score76.52 | 19 | |
| Word Sense Disambiguation | FEWS | Noun WSD Accuracy81 | 12 | |
| Binary classification of sense ID | Fool me if you can (Set 4) | F1 Score85.2 | 10 | |
| Binary classification of sense ID | Fool me if you can (Set 1) | F1 Score97 | 10 | |
| Binary classification of sense ID | Fool me if you can (Set 2) | F1 Score97.2 | 10 | |
| Binary classification of sense ID | Fool me if you can (Set 3) | F1 Score84.7 | 10 |