EntON: Eigenentropy-Optimized Neighborhood Densification in 3D Gaussian Splatting
About
We present a novel Eigenentropy-optimized neighboorhood densification strategy EntON in 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) for geometrically accurate and high-quality rendered 3D reconstruction. While standard 3DGS produces Gaussians whose centers and surfaces are poorly aligned with the underlying object geometry, surface-focused reconstruction methods frequently sacrifice photometric accuracy. In contrast to the conventional densification strategy, which relies on the magnitude of the view-space position gradient, our approach introduces a geometry-aware strategy to guide adaptive splitting and pruning. Specifically, we compute the 3D shape feature Eigenentropy from the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix in the k-nearest neighborhood of each Gaussian center, which quantifies the local structural order. These Eigenentropy values are integrated into an alternating optimization framework: During the optimization process, the algorithm alternates between (i) standard gradient-based densification, which refines regions via view-space gradients, and (ii) Eigenentropy-aware densification, which preferentially densifies Gaussians in low-Eigenentropy (ordered, flat) neighborhoods to better capture fine geometric details on the object surface, and prunes those in high-Eigenentropy (disordered, spherical) regions. We provide quantitative and qualitative evaluations on two benchmark datasets: small-scale DTU dataset and large-scale TUM2TWIN dataset, covering man-made objects and urban scenes. Experiments demonstrate that our Eigenentropy-aware alternating densification strategy improves geometric accuracy by up to 33% and rendering quality by up to 7%, while reducing the number of Gaussians by up to 50% and training time by up to 23%. Overall, EnTON achieves a favorable balance between geometric accuracy, rendering quality and efficiency by avoiding unnecessary scene expansion.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geometry Reconstruction | DTU (full) | Error Metric 240.9 | 25 | |
| Scene Representation | TUM2TWIN | Number of Gaussians2 | 21 | |
| 3D Scene Reconstruction | DTU | Chamfer Distance (Scan 24)2.58e+5 | 17 | |
| Image Rendering | Self-collected Campus Dataset (Building2) | PSNR30.84 | 11 | |
| 3D Reconstruction Training | DTU (test) | Scan 24 Error10.97 | 8 | |
| Novel View Synthesis | DTU | PSNR (Scan 24)35.38 | 8 | |
| Rendering | TUM2TWIN (building1) | PSNR32.57 | 7 | |
| Surface Accuracy | TUM2TWIN (building1) | Chamfer Distance0.179 | 7 | |
| 3D Scene Reconstruction | TUM2TWIN (building1) | Training Time (min)20.56 | 7 | |
| 3D Scene Reconstruction | TUM2TWIN (building2) | Training Time (min)18.04 | 7 |