Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

ReflexiCoder: Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Reflect on Generated Code and Self-Correct It via Reinforcement Learning

About

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, standard ``System 1'' approaches that generate solutions in a single forward pass often hit a performance ceiling on complex algorithmic tasks. Existing iterative refinement strategies attempt to bridge this gap at inference time, yet they predominantly rely on external oracles, execution feedback, or computationally expensive prompt-response cycles. In this work, we propose ReflexiCoder, a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework that internalizes the structured reasoning trajectory, encompassing initial generation, bug and optimization aware reflection, and self-correction, directly into the model's weights. Unlike prior methods, ReflexiCoder shifts the paradigm from external-dependent refinement to an intrinsic, fully autonomous self-reflection and self-correction capabilities at inference time. We utilize an RL-only training paradigm with granular reward functions to optimize the entire reflection-correction trajectory, teaching the model how to debug without reliance on ground-truth feedback or execution engines at inference time. Extensive experiments across seven benchmarks demonstrate that our ReflexiCoder-8B establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) among leading open-source models in the 1.5B to 14B range, achieving 94.51% (87.20%) on HumanEval (Plus), 81.80% (78.57%) on MBPP (Plus), 35.00% on BigCodeBench, 52.21% on LiveCodeBench, and 37.34% on CodeForces in a single-attempt setting, rivaling or surpassing proprietary models like GPT-5.1. Notably, our framework is significantly more token-efficient than base models, reducing inference-time compute overhead by approximately 40% through disciplined, efficient reasoning and reflection patterns. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/juyongjiang/ReflexiCoder.

Juyong Jiang, Jiasi Shen, Sunghun Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Jeonghoon Kim, Sungju Kim• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Code GenerationHumanEval
Pass@195.73
1043
Code GenerationHumanEval+
Pass@187.8
393
Code GenerationMBPP+
Pass@179.1
238
Code GenerationMBPP
Pass@1 Accuracy82
59
Code GenerationLiveCodeBench
Pass@154.12
51
Code GenerationBigCodeBench
pass@136.84
18
Code GenerationCodeForces
pass@137.68
14
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update