Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Optimizing Multi-Modal Models for Image-Based Shape Retrieval: The Role of Pre-Alignment and Hard Contrastive Learning

About

Image-based shape retrieval (IBSR) aims to retrieve 3D models from a database given a query image, hence addressing a classical task in computer vision, computer graphics, and robotics. Recent approaches typically rely on bridging the domain gap between 2D images and 3D shapes based on the use of multi-view renderings as well as task-specific metric learning to embed shapes and images into a common latent space. In contrast, we address IBSR through large-scale multi-modal pretraining and show that explicit view-based supervision is not required. Inspired by pre-aligned image--point-cloud encoders from ULIP and OpenShape that have been used for tasks such as 3D shape classification, we propose the use of pre-aligned image and shape encoders for zero-shot and standard IBSR by embedding images and point clouds into a shared representation space and performing retrieval via similarity search over compact single-embedding shape descriptors. This formulation allows skipping view synthesis and naturally enables zero-shot and cross-domain retrieval without retraining on the target database. We evaluate pre-aligned encoders in both zero-shot and supervised IBSR settings and additionally introduce a multi-modal hard contrastive loss (HCL) to further increase retrieval performance. Our evaluation demonstrates state-of-the-art performance, outperforming related methods on $Acc_{Top1}$ and $Acc_{Top10}$ for shape retrieval across multiple datasets, with best results observed for OpenShape combined with Point-BERT. Furthermore, training on our proposed multi-modal HCL yields dataset-dependent gains in standard instance retrieval tasks on shape-centric data, underscoring the value of pretraining and hard contrastive learning for 3D shape retrieval. The code will be made available via the project website.

Paul Julius K\"uhn, Cedric Spengler, Michael Weinmann, Arjan Kuijper, Saptarshi Neil Sinha• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image-based shape retrievalPix3D 41 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy (Instance)34.6
8
Image-based shape retrievalCompCars 50 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy (instance)10.9
8
Image-based shape retrievalStanfordCars 21 (test)
Top-1 Instance Accuracy11.4
8
RetrievalPix3D
Top-1 Instance Accuracy80.7
8
RetrievalCompCars
Top-1 Instance Accuracy97.7
8
RetrievalStanfordCars
Top-1 Accuracy (instance)95.8
8
Zero-Shot RetrievalModelNet40 46 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy (Instance)30.5
8
Zero-Shot RetrievalObjaverseLVIS 6 (test)
Top-1 Instance Accuracy46.9
5
RetrievalModelNet40
Top-1 Accuracy (Instance)57.3
4
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update