Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

RESCHED: Rethinking Flexible Job Shop Scheduling from a Transformer-based Architecture with Simplified States

About

Neural approaches to the Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (FJSP), particularly those based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL), have gained growing attention in recent years. However, existing methods rely on complex feature-engineered state representations (i.e., often requiring more than 20 handcrafted features) and graph-biased neural architectures. To reduce modeling complexity and advance a more generalizable framework for FJSP, we introduce \textsc{ReSched}, a minimalist DRL framework that rethinks both the scheduling formulation and model design. First, by revisiting the Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulation of FJSP, we condense the state space to just four essential features, eliminating historical dependencies through a subproblem-based perspective. Second, we employ Transformer blocks with dot-product attention, augmented by three lightweight but effective architectural modifications tailored to scheduling tasks. Extensive experiments show that \textsc{ReSched} outperforms classical dispatching rules and state-of-the-art DRL methods on FJSP. Moreover, \textsc{ReSched} also generalizes well to the Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) and the Flexible Flow Shop Scheduling Problem (FFSP), achieving competitive performance against neural baselines specifically designed for these variants.

Xiangjie Xiao, Cong Zhang, Wen Song, Zhiguang Cao• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Job-Shop Scheduling ProblemDMU benchmark of JSSP
Average Gap (Instance-wise)22.2
48
Flexible Flow Shop ProblemFFSP 20
Optimality Gap (%)25.12
18
Flexible Flow Shop ProblemFFSP50
Optimality Gap49.65
16
Flexible Flow Shop ProblemFFSP100
Solution Gap (%)90.8
16
Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (FJSP)SD1 In-distribution
Gap (%)5.98
11
Job-Shop Scheduling ProblemTaillard 15 x 15
Optimality Gap15.74
8
Job-Shop Scheduling ProblemTaillard 20 x 15
Optimality Gap (%)19.7
8
Job-Shop Scheduling ProblemTaillard 20 x 20
Gap (%)16.3
8
Job-Shop Scheduling ProblemTaillard 30 x 15
Optimality Gap (%)21.5
8
Job-Shop Scheduling ProblemTaillard 30 x 20
Gap (%)22.5
8
Showing 10 of 23 rows

Other info

Follow for update