Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Adaptive Capacity Allocation for Vision Language Action Fine-tuning

About

Vision language action models (VLAs) are increasingly used for Physical AI, but deploying a pre-trained VLA model to unseen environments, embodiments, or tasks still requires adaptation. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), especially LoRA, is common for VLA policies, yet the exposed capacity knob, the rank, does not transfer uniformly: robotics transfer exhibits a higher and task-varying intrinsic rank than language fine-tuning. Small ranks suffice for LLMs (e.g., $r \in \{4, 8\}$), while spectral analyses indicate VLAs may require much larger ranks (e.g., $r \approx 128$) or near-full rank, a mismatch that worsens in multi-task settings. We present LoRA-SP (Select-Prune), a rank-adaptive fine-tuning method that replaces fixed-rank updates with input- and layer-wise capacity. LoRA-SP uses an SVD-style parameterization with a small router whose nonnegative scores act as singular values over a shared vector bank. The active set is chosen by an energy target on the cumulative squared scores $E(k) \ge \eta$, providing a direct link to approximation error via our spectral analysis. During training, $\eta$ concentrates energy on a few directions and teaches the router to rely on fewer vectors while preserving accuracy. This yields compact adapters that reduce cross-task interference and improve generalization. On four real-robot manipulation tasks collected on an unseen AgileX PiPER arm, across two VLA backbones ($\pi_0$ and SmolVLA), LoRA-SP matches or exceeds full fine-tuning with far fewer trainable parameters, and improves multi-task success by up to 31.6% over standard LoRA while remaining robust to rank choice.

Donghoon Kim, Minji Bae, Unghui Nam, Gyeonghun Kim, Suyun Lee, Kyuhong Shim, Byonghyo Shim• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
pick placeAgileX PiPER real-world
Success Rate93.3
14
OpenAgileX PiPER real-world
Success Rate86.7
12
PourAgileX PiPER real-world
Success Rate86.7
12
PressAgileX PiPER real-world
Success Rate100
12
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update