Constraints Matrix Diffusion based Generative Neural Solver for Vehicle Routing Problems
About
Over the past decade, neural network solvers powered by generative artificial intelligence have garnered significant attention in the domain of vehicle routing problems (VRPs), owing to their exceptional computational efficiency and superior reasoning capabilities. In particular, autoregressive solvers integrated with reinforcement learning have emerged as a prominent trend. However, much of the existing work emphasizes large-scale generalization of neural approaches while neglecting the limited robustness of attention-based methods across heterogeneous distributions of problem parameters. Their improvements over heuristic search remain largely restricted to hand-curated, fixed-distribution benchmarks. Furthermore, these architectures tend to degrade significantly when node representations are highly similar or when tasks involve long decision horizons. To address the aforementioned limitations, we propose a novel fusion neural network framework that employs a discrete noise graph diffusion model to learn the underlying constraints of vehicle routing problems and generate a constraint assignment matrix. This matrix is subsequently integrated adaptively into the feature representation learning and decision process of the autoregressive solver, serving as a graph structure mask that facilitates the formation of solutions characterized by both global vision and local feature integration. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents the first comprehensive experimental investigation of neural network model solvers across a 378-combinatorial space spanning four distinct dimensions within the CVRPlib public dataset. Extensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that our proposed fusion model effectively captures and leverages problem constraints, achieving state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmark datasets.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP 20 | Optimality Gap (%)0.65 | 27 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP50 | Optimality Gap (%)0.48 | 17 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRP 100 | Optimality Gap (%)1.23 | 17 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLib (test) | Average Gap5.1 | 9 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLIB (A-n44-k6) | Objective Value972 | 4 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLIB A-n45-k6 | Objective Value970 | 4 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLIB A-n69-k9 | Objective Value1.19e+3 | 4 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLIB B-n34-k5 | Objective Value811 | 4 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLIB B-n35-k5 | Objective Value965 | 4 | |
| Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem | CVRPLIB B-n45-k6 | Objective Value710 | 4 |