Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Efficient Policy Learning with Hybrid Evaluation-Based Genetic Programming for Uncertain Agile Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling

About

The Uncertain Agile Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling Problem (UAEOSSP) is a novel combinatorial optimization problem and a practical engineering challenge that aligns with the current demands of space technology development. It incorporates uncertainties in profit, resource consumption, and visibility, which may render pre-planned schedules suboptimal or even infeasible. Genetic Programming Hyper-Heuristic (GPHH) shows promise for evolving interpretable scheduling policies; however, their simulation-based evaluation incurs high computational costs. Moreover, the design of the constructive method, denoted as Online Scheduling Algorithm (OSA), directly affects fitness assessment, resulting in evaluation-dependent local optima within the policy space. To address these issues, this paper proposes a Hybrid Evaluation-based Genetic Programming (HE-GP) for effectively solving UAEOSSP. A Hybrid Evaluation (HE) mechanism is integrated into the policy-driven OSA, combining exact and approximate filtering modes: exact mode ensures evaluation accuracy through elaborately designed constraint verification modules, while approximate mode reduces computational overhead via simplified logic. HE-GP dynamically switches between evaluation models based on real-time evolutionary state information. Experiments on 16 simulated instance sets demonstrate that HE-GP significantly outperforms handcrafted heuristics and single-evaluation based GPHH, achieving substantial reductions in computational cost while maintaining excellent scheduling performance across diverse scenarios. Specifically, the average training time of HE-GP was reduced by 17.77\% compared to GP employing exclusively exact evaluation, while the optimal policy generated by HE-GP achieved the highest average ranks across all scenarios.

Junhua Xue, Yuning Chen, Mingyan Shao, Yangming Zhou, Qinghua Wu, Yingwu Chen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 50_36_20_0.15
Average Performance1.39e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 50_36_20_0.30
Average Performance1.35e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 50_72_20_0.15
Average Performance1.41e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 100_36_20_0.30
Average Performance1.50e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 100_72_20_0.30
Average Performance1.51e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 150_36_40_0.15
Average Performance2.83e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 150_72_40_0.15
Average Performance2.86e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 150_72_40_0.30
Average Performance2.77e+3
5
Resource SchedulingScheduling Scenario 200_36_40_0.15
Average Performance3.01e+3
5
Resource SchedulingResource Scheduling Scenarios Overall
Average Rank1.4375
5
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update