Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

When Detectors Forget Forensics: Blocking Semantic Shortcuts for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection

About

The growing realism of generative models has blurred the boundary between real and synthetic content, posing significant challenges to reliable AI-generated image detection. Although large-scale pre-trained Vision Foundation Models have advanced detection capability, their generalization to images from unseen generation pipelines remains inadequate. In this paper, we identify, for the first time, a key failure mechanism, termed \emph{semantic fallback}, wherein forensic fine-tuning fails to fully reshape the representation space. Consequently, the resulting representations remain organized along high-level semantic structures rather than manipulation-specific forensic cues. Building on this insight, we propose a \textbf{Geometric Semantic Decoupling (GSD)} framework, which explicitly suppresses semantically dominant directions, thereby promoting invariant forensic representations. Specifically, GSD leverages a frozen CLIP encoder to estimate the dominant semantic subspace via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). It then suppresses the semantic components through a geometry-constrained formulation with the suppression strength adaptively modulated across samples and layers. We further introduce a mini-batch SVD approximation strategy that amortizes subspace estimation, achieving over a $15 \times$ reduction in computational overhead while preserving effectiveness. Finally, considering practical scenarios spanning both large-scale and online evaluation, we develop three inference protocols, batch, per-sample, and reference-based inference, and demonstrate that they induce consistent semantic decoupling, yielding a stable forgery-oriented feature manifold.

Chao Shuai, Shaojing Fan, Chenlin Zou, Bin Gong, Weichen Lian, Xiuli Bi, Zhenguang Liu, Zhongjie Ba, Kui Ren• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Deepfake DetectionCDFv1, CDFv2, DFD, DFDCP, DFDC (test)
Overall Average Score94.4
74
Fake Image DetectionUniversalFakeDetect (test)
Pro-GAN Detection Rate100
52
Generated Image DetectionGenImage v1.4 (test)
Average AP92.8
34
Deepfake DetectionDF40 (cross-manipulation)
UniFace Detection Rate98.6
22
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update