Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Few-for-Many Personalized Federated Learning

About

Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) aims to train customized models for clients with highly heterogeneous data distributions while preserving data privacy. Existing approaches often rely on heuristics like clustering or model interpolation, which lack principled mechanisms for balancing heterogeneous client objectives. Serving $M$ clients with distinct data distributions is inherently a multi-objective optimization problem, where achieving optimal personalization ideally requires $M$ distinct models on the Pareto front. However, maintaining $M$ separate models poses significant scalability challenges in federated settings with hundreds or thousands of clients. To address this challenge, we reformulate PFL as a few-for-many optimization problem that maintains only $K$ shared server models ($K \ll M$) to collectively serve all $M$ clients. We prove that this framework achieves near-optimal personalization: the approximation error diminishes as $K$ increases and each client's model converges to each client's optimum as data grows. Building on this reformulation, we propose FedFew, a practical algorithm that jointly optimizes the $K$ server models through efficient gradient-based updates. Unlike clustering-based approaches that require manual client partitioning or interpolation-based methods that demand careful hyperparameter tuning, FedFew automatically discovers the optimal model diversity through its optimization process. Experiments across vision, NLP, and real-world medical imaging datasets demonstrate that FedFew, with just 3 models, consistently outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/pgg3/FedFew.

Ping Guo, Tiantian Zhang, Xi Lin, Xiang Li, Zhi-Ri Tang, Qingfu Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Medical Image ClassificationKvasir
Accuracy92.84
24
Federated LearningCIFAR-100
Jain's Fairness Index99.7
21
Federated LearningCIFAR-10
Jain's Fairness Index0.997
21
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 Practical
Mean Accuracy53.69
18
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 Pathological
Mean Accuracy65.47
18
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Practical
Mean Accuracy88.26
18
Medical Image ClassificationFedISIC
Average Accuracy69.57
10
Image ClassificationTiny ImageNet Practical
Mean Accuracy30.31
9
Text ClassificationAG News Practical
Mean Accuracy96.07
9
Image ClassificationFEMNIST Practical
Mean Accuracy100
9
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update