Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Adaptive Layerwise Perturbation: Unifying Off-Policy Corrections for LLM RL

About

Off-policy problems such as policy staleness and training--inference mismatch have become a major bottleneck for training stability and further exploration in LLM RL. The distribution gap between the inference and updated policies grows because of the techniques to enhance inference efficiency, leading to heavy-tailed importance ratios. Heavy-tailed ratios arise when the policy is locally sharp, which further inflates gradients and can push updates outside the trust region. To address this, we propose Adaptive Layerwise Perturbation (ALP), which injects small learnable perturbations into the input hidden states of each layer during updates and uses the resulting perturbed policy as the numerator of the importance ratio against the unchanged inference policy in the objective. Intuitively, by adding controlled noise to intermediate representations, ALP prevents the updated policy from deviating too sharply from the inference policy and enlarges the policy family to cover inference-time mismatch noise. Hence, the flattened distribution can naturally tighten the gap between the updated and inference policies and reduce the tail of importance ratios, thus maintaining training stability. This is further validated empirically. Experiments on single-turn math and multi-turn tool-integrated reasoning tasks show that ALP not only improves final performance, but also avoids blow-up in the importance-ratio tail and KL spikes during iterative training, along with boosted exploration. Ablations show that representation-level perturbations across all layers are most effective, substantially outperforming partial-layer and logits-only variants.

Chenlu Ye, Xuanchang Zhang, Yifan Hao, Zhou Yu, Ziji Zhang, Abhinav Gullapalli, Hao Chen, Jing Huang, Tong Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva Math
Accuracy37.27
228
Mathematical ReasoningOlympiad Bench
Accuracy40.77
222
Mathematical ReasoningMATH500
Accuracy78.1
50
Mathematical ReasoningMATH500
Accuracy (%)84.29
47
Tool-Integrated ReasoningMinerva Math
Test Accuracy43.18
6
Tool-Integrated ReasoningOlympiad Bench
Test Accuracy52.75
6
Tool-Integrated ReasoningAIME 24
Test Accuracy43.85
6
Tool-Integrated ReasoningAIME 25
Test Accuracy31.25
6
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update