Linear-Nonlinear Fusion Neural Operator for Partial Differential Equations
About
Neural operator learning directly constructs the mapping relationship from the equation parameter space to the solution space, enabling efficient direct inference in practical applications without the need for repeated solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) -- an advantage that is difficult to achieve with traditional numerical methods. In this work, we find that explicitly decoupling linear and nonlinear effects within such operator mappings leads to improved learning efficiency. This yields a novel network structure, namely the Linear-Nonlinear Fusion Neural Operator (LNF-NO), which models operator mappings via the multiplicative fusion of a linear component and a nonlinear component, thus achieving a lightweight and interpretable representation. This linear-nonlinear decoupling enables efficient capture of complex solution features at the operator level while maintaining stability and generality. LNF-NO naturally supports multiple functional inputs and is applicable to both regular grids and irregular geometries. Across a diverse suite of PDE operator-learning benchmarks, including nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equations and multi-physics coupled systems, LNF-NO is typically substantially faster to train than several representative neural operator baselines, while achieving comparable or improved accuracy across most tested cases. On the tested 3D Poisson-Boltzmann case, LNF-NO achieves strong accuracy while requiring substantially less training time than the three-dimensional Fourier Neural Operator and Transolver baselines.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operator learning | Laplace (test) | Rel. L2 Error0.0111 | 3 | |
| Operator learning | PB k = 1 (test) | Relative L2 Error (Test)0.0229 | 3 | |
| Operator Learning (Poisson-Boltzmann Equation) | Poisson-Boltzmann k=0.01 (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0183 | 3 | |
| Operator Learning (Poisson-Boltzmann Equation) | Poisson-Boltzmann k=1 (test) | Relative L2 Error (%) (Test)2.29 | 3 | |
| Operator Learning (Poisson-Boltzmann Equation) | Poisson-Boltzmann k=100 (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0242 | 3 | |
| PDE learning | 3D Poisson–Boltzmann 33^3 grid (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0426 | 3 | |
| Predicting fields on a fixed grid | PB with source (k = 1) on regular grid (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0191 | 3 | |
| Operator learning | Burgers' (test) | Relative L2 Error (Test)0.0386 | 3 | |
| Operator learning | Darcy Smooth Coeff. (test) | Relative L2 Error (Test)0.0034 | 3 | |
| Operator learning | Darcy Piecewise Coeff. (test) | Relative L2 Error (Test)3.3 | 3 |