Large Language Model Guided Incentive Aware Reward Design for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
About
Designing effective auxiliary rewards for cooperative multi-agent systems remains challenging, as misaligned incentives can induce suboptimal coordination, particularly when sparse task rewards provide insufficient grounding for coordinated behavior. This study introduces an autonomous reward design framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to synthesize executable reward programs from environment instrumentation. The procedure constrains candidate programs within a formal validity envelope and trains policies from scratch using Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) under a fixed computational budget. The candidates are then evaluated on the basis of their performance, and selection across generations solely based on the sparse task returns. The framework is evaluated in four Overcooked-AI layouts characterized by varying levels of corridor congestion, handoff dependencies, and structural asymmetries. The proposed reward design approach consistently yields higher task returns and delivery counts, with the most pronounced gains observed in environments dominated by interaction bottlenecks. Diagnostic analysis of the synthesized shaping components reveals stronger interdependence in action selection and improved signal alignment in coordination-intensive tasks. These results demonstrate that the proposed LLM-guided reward search framework mitigates the need for manual engineering while producing shaping signals compatible with cooperative learning under finite budgets.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Cooking | Overcooked-AI Cramped Room | -- | 4 | |
| Cooperative Cooking | Overcooked-AI Forced Coordination | J Score103 | 3 | |
| Cooperative Cooking | Overcooked-AI Coordination Ring | J-Score153 | 3 | |
| Cooperative Cooking | Overcooked-AI Asymmetric Advantages | J Score381 | 3 |