Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

MoE-GRPO: Optimizing Mixture-of-Experts via Reinforcement Learning in Vision-Language Models

About

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has emerged as an effective approach to reduce the computational overhead of Transformer architectures by sparsely activating a subset of parameters for each token while preserving high model capacity. This paradigm has recently been extended to Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enabling scalable multi-modal understanding with reduced computational cost. However, the widely adopted deterministic top-K routing mechanism may overlook more optimal expert combinations and lead to expert overfitting. To address this limitation and improve the diversity of expert selection, we propose MoE-GRPO, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based framework for optimizing expert routing in MoE-based VLMs. Specifically, we formulate expert selection as a sequential decision-making problem and optimize it using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), allowing the model to learn adaptive expert routing policies through exploration and reward-based feedback. Furthermore, we introduce a modality-aware router guidance that enhances training stability and efficiency by discouraging the router from exploring experts that are infrequently activated for a given modality. Extensive experiments on multi-modal image and video benchmarks show that MoE-GRPO consistently outperforms standard top-K routing and its variants by promoting more diverse expert selection, thereby mitigating expert overfitting and enabling a task-level expert specialization.

Dohwan Ko, Jinyoung Park, Seoung Choi, Sanghyeok Lee, Seohyun Lee, Hyunwoo J. Kim• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet V2--
767
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy53.8
610
Image ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy58.9
569
Image ClassificationFlowers102
Accuracy75.9
558
Multimodal UnderstandingMMStar--
511
Image ClassificationFood101
Accuracy90.5
457
Image ClassificationSUN397
Accuracy71.1
450
Image ClassificationStanfordCars
Accuracy75.5
384
Image ClassificationAircraft
Accuracy30
340
Image ClassificationOxfordPets
Accuracy91.6
298
Showing 10 of 22 rows

Other info

Follow for update