Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

GlowQ: Group-Shared LOw-Rank Approximation for Quantized LLMs

About

Quantization techniques such as BitsAndBytes, AWQ, and GPTQ are widely used as a standard method in deploying large language models but often degrades accuracy when using low-bit representations, e.g., 4 bits. Low-rank correction methods (e.g., LQER, QERA, ASER) has been proposed to mitigate this issue, however, they restore all layers and insert error-correction modules into every decoder block, which increases latency and memory overhead. To address this limitation, we propose GlowQ, a group-shared low-rank approximation for quantized LLMs that caches a single shared right factor per input-sharing group and restores only the groups or layers that yield the highest accuracy benefit. GlowQ computes the high-precision projection once per input-sharing group and reuses it across its modules, reducing parameter and memory overhead, and retaining the expressivity of layer-specific corrections. We also propose a selective variant, GlowQ-S, that applies the cached shared module only where it provides the largest benefit. Compared with strong baselines, our approach reduces TTFB by (5.6%) and increases throughput by (9.6%) on average, while reducing perplexity on WikiText-2 by (0.17%) and increasing downstream accuracy by 0.42 percentage points. The selective model GlowQ-S further reduces latency, cutting TTFB by (23.4%) and increasing throughput by (37.4%), while maintaining accuracy within 0.2 percentage points on average.

Selim An, Il hong Suh, Yeseong Kim• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Language ModelingWikiText-2 (test)
PPL4.96
1949
Language ModelingC4
Perplexity7.85
1071
Question AnsweringARC Challenge
Accuracy57
906
Question AnsweringARC Easy--
597
Question AnsweringPIQA
Accuracy78.33
374
Question AnsweringBoolQ--
317
Sentence CompletionHellaSwag
Accuracy67.67
276
Word PredictionLAMBADA
Accuracy74
148
Pronoun ResolutionWinoGrande
Accuracy74.67
41
Zero-shot EvaluationEvaluation Tasks Zero-shot Aggregate
Avg. Accuracy73.24
39
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update