Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

CHIRP dataset: towards long-term, individual-level, behavioral monitoring of bird populations in the wild

About

Long-term behavioral monitoring of individual animals is crucial for studying behavioral changes that occur over different time scales, especially for conservation and evolutionary biology. Computer vision methods have proven to benefit biodiversity monitoring, but automated behavior monitoring in wild populations remains challenging. This stems from the lack of datasets that cover a range of computer vision tasks necessary to extract biologically meaningful measurements of individual animals. Here, we introduce such a dataset (CHIRP) with a new method (CORVID) for individual re-identification of wild birds. The CHIRP (Combining beHaviour, Individual Re-identification and Postures) dataset is curated from a long-term population of wild Siberian jays studied in Swedish Lapland, supporting re-identification (re-id), action recognition, 2D keypoint estimation, object detection, and instance segmentation. In addition to traditional task-specific benchmarking, we introduce application-specific benchmarking with biologically relevant metrics (feeding rates, co-occurrence rates) to evaluate the performance of models in real-world use cases. Finally, we present CORVID (COlouR-based Video re-ID), a novel pipeline for individual identification of birds based on the segmentation and classification of colored leg rings, a widespread approach for visual identification of individual birds. CORVID offers a probability-based id tracking method by matching the detected combination of color rings with a database. We use application-specific benchmarking to show that CORVID outperforms state-of-the-art re-id methods. We hope this work offers the community a blueprint for curating real-world datasets from ethically approved biological studies to bridge the gap between computer vision research and biological applications.

Alex Hoi Hang Chan, Neha Singhal, Onur Kocahan, Andrea Meltzer, Saverio Lubrano, Miyako H. Warrington, Michel Griesser, Fumihiro Kano, Hemal Naik• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
2D Keypoint EstimationChirp--
6
Co-occurrence Rate EstimationChirp
Mean0.041
4
Individual Feeding Rate EstimationChirp
Mean Feeding Rate9
4
Action RecognitionCHIRP 1.0 (test)
Peck Precision48.5
3
Tracking and Individual IdentificationCHIRP 1.0 (test)
Accuracy64.7
3
Video Re-identificationCHIRP Closed set - Within Territory
Top-1 Accuracy66
3
Video Re-identificationCHIRP Closed set - Within Terr. + Neighbours
Top-1 Acc29
3
Video Re-identificationCHIRP Disjointed set - Within Territory
Top-1 Accuracy69
3
Video Re-identificationCHIRP Disjointed set - Within Terr. + Neighbours
Top-1 Accuracy31
3
Video Re-identificationCHIRP Disjointed set - All
Top-1 Accuracy6
3
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update