Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

AcTTA: Rethinking Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic Activation

About

Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to mitigate performance degradation under distribution shifts by updating model parameters during inference. Existing approaches have primarily framed adaptation around affine modulation, focusing on recalibrating normalization layers. This perspective, while effective, overlooks another influential component in representation dynamics: the activation function. We revisit this overlooked space and propose AcTTA, an activation-aware framework that reinterprets conventional activation functions from a learnable perspective and updates them adaptively at test time. AcTTA reformulates conventional activation functions (e.g., ReLU, GELU) into parameterized forms that shift their response threshold and modulate gradient sensitivity, enabling the network to adjust activation behavior under domain shifts. This functional reparameterization enables continuous adjustment of activation behavior without modifying network weights or requiring source data. Despite its simplicity, AcTTA achieves robust and stable adaptation across diverse corruptions. Across CIFAR10-C, CIFAR100-C, and ImageNet-C, AcTTA consistently surpasses normalization-based TTA methods. Our findings highlight activation adaptation as a compact and effective route toward domain-shift-robust test-time learning, broadening the prevailing affine-centric view of adaptation.

Hyeongyu Kim, Geonhui Han, Dosik Hwang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet A--
654
Image ClassificationImageNet-R--
529
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10-C--
162
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10C Severity Level 5 (test)
Average Error Rate (Severity 5)9.41
127
Image ClassificationImageNet-C Severity 5 (test)
Mean Error Rate (Severity 5)47.73
104
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-C--
76
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100C Level 5 (test)--
51
Image ClassificationImageNet-C
Corruption Error62.07
30
Image ClassificationPACS
Error Rate13.09
6
Image ClassificationCIFAR100-C Target
Accuracy (Gaussian)39.42
5
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update