The Geometry of Robustness: Optimizing Loss Landscape Curvature and Feature Manifold Alignment for Robust Finetuning of Vision-Language Models
About
Fine-tuning approaches for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) face a critical three-way trade-off between In-Distribution (ID) accuracy, Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization, and adversarial robustness. Existing robust fine-tuning strategies resolve at most two axes of this trade-off. Generalization-preserving methods retain ID/OOD performance but leave models vulnerable to adversarial attacks, while adversarial training improves robustness to targeted attacks but degrades ID/OOD accuracy. Our key insight is that the robustness trade-off stems from two geometric failures: sharp, anisotropic minima in parameter space and unstable feature representations that deform under perturbation. To address this, we propose GRACE (Gram-aligned Robustness via Adaptive Curvature Estimation), a unified fine-tuning framework that jointly regularizes the parameter-space curvature and feature-space invariance for VLMs. Grounded in Robust PAC-Bayes theory, GRACE employs adaptive weight perturbations scaled by local curvature to promote flatter minima, combined with a feature alignment loss that maintains representation consistency across clean, adversarial, and OOD inputs. On ImageNet fine-tuning of CLIP models, GRACE simultaneously improves ID accuracy by 10.8%, and adversarial accuracy by 13.5% while maintaining 57.0% OOD accuracy (vs. 57.4% zero-shot baseline). Geometric analysis confirms that GRACE converges to flatter minima without feature distortion across distribution shifts, providing a principled step toward generalized robustness in foundation VLMs.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | ImageNet A | Top-1 Acc31.2 | 654 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet V2 | Top-1 Acc72.2 | 611 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-R | -- | 217 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-S | Top-1 Acc49.3 | 92 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet Robustness Suite | -- | 42 | |
| Classification | Oxford Pets zero-shot | Accuracy (Zero-Shot)90.4 | 26 | |
| Image Classification | Average Zero-shot (8 datasets) | Clean Accuracy Avg71.48 | 22 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet ID Clean Adv | Top-1 Accuracy82.3 | 22 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet A-Plus | Top-1 Accuracy36.8 | 22 | |
| Zero-shot Image Classification | DTD | Clean Accuracy52.6 | 21 |