Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Policy-Controlled Generalized Share: A General Framework with a Transformer Instantiation for Strictly Online Switching-Oracle Tracking

About

Static regret to a single expert is often the wrong target for strictly online prediction under non-stationarity, where the best expert may switch repeatedly over time. We study Policy-Controlled Generalized Share (PCGS), a general strictly online framework in which the generalized-share recursion is fixed while the post-loss update controls are allowed to vary adaptively. Its principal instantiation in this paper is PCGS-TF, which uses a causal Transformer as an update controller: after round t finishes and the loss vector is observed, the Transformer outputs the controls that map w_t to w_{t+1} without altering the already committed decision w_t. Under admissible post-loss update controls, we obtain a pathwise weighted regret guarantee for general time-varying learning rates, and a standard dynamic-regret guarantee against any expert path with at most S switches under the constant-learning-rate specialization. Empirically, on a controlled synthetic suite with exact dynamic-programming switching-oracle evaluation, PCGS-TF attains the lowest mean dynamic regret in all seven non-stationary families, with its advantage increasing for larger expert pools. On a reproduced household-electricity benchmark, PCGS-TF also achieves the lowest normalized dynamic regret for S = 5, 10, and 20.

Hongkai Hu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Dynamic Regret Minimizationhousehold electricity consumption real-data
Normalized Dynamic Regret0.0063
16
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)Switch Family Synthetic
Mean Dynamic Regret18.93
4
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)Drift Family Synthetic
Dynamic Regret (mean)18.64
4
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)Hetero Family Synthetic
Mean Dynamic Regret20.73
4
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)HeavyTail Family Synthetic
Mean Dynamic Regret21.17
4
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)Mix Family Synthetic
Mean Dynamic Regret19.39
4
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)Predictive Family Synthetic
Mean Dynamic Regret16.14
4
Online Learning (Dynamic Regret Minimization)Adversarial Family Synthetic
Mean Dynamic Regret20.64
4
Online sequence predictionSynthetic non-stationary sequences Adversarial family
Win Rate (vs GenShare)100
1
Online sequence predictionSynthetic non-stationary sequences Drift family
Win Rate vs GenShare100
1
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update