Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Attention at Rest Stays at Rest: Breaking Visual Inertia for Cognitive Hallucination Mitigation

About

Like a body at rest that stays at rest, we find that visual attention in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) exhibits pronounced inertia, remaining largely static once settled during early decoding steps and failing to support the compositional understanding required for cognitive inference. While existing hallucination mitigation methods mainly target perceptual hallucinations concerning object existence or attributes, they remain inadequate for such cognitive hallucinations that require inter-object relational deduction. Through token-wise attention analysis, we identify this visual inertia as a key factor: attention to semantically critical regions remains persistently focused and fails to dynamically support relational inference. We thereby propose a training-free Inertia-aware Visual Excitation (IVE) method that breaks this inertial pattern by modeling cognitive inference as the dynamic responsiveness of visual attention. Specifically, IVE selects visual tokens that are dynamically emerging relative to historical attention trends while distinguishing tokens exhibiting inertial behavior. To further facilitate compositional inference, IVE introduces an inertia-aware penalty that discourages over-concentration and limits the persistence of attention within localized regions. Extensive experiments show that IVE is effective across various base MLLMs and multiple hallucination benchmarks, particularly for cognitive hallucinations.

Boyang Gong, Yu Zheng, Fanye Kong, Jie Zhou, Jiwen Lu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Cognitive Hallucination MitigationMME cognitive 12 (test)
Commonsense Reasoning Score124.5
24
Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) AnsweringReefknot
Perc. Score72.09
24
Yes/No Question AnsweringReefknot
Accuracy43.75
24
Perceptual Hallucination MitigationPOPE (Random)
Accuracy92.1
12
Perceptual Hallucination MitigationPOPE Popular
Accuracy89.7
6
Perceptual Hallucination MitigationPOPE Adversarial
Accuracy88.17
6
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update