Structure-Preserving Multi-View Embedding Using Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport
About
Multi-view data analysis seeks to integrate multiple representations of the same samples in order to recover a coherent low-dimensional structure. Classical approaches often rely on feature concatenation or explicit alignment assumptions, which become restrictive under heterogeneous geometries or nonlinear distortions. In this work, we propose two geometry-aware multi-view embedding strategies grounded in Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) optimal transport. The first, termed Mean-GWMDS, aggregates view-specific relational information by averaging distance matrices and applying GW-based multidimensional scaling to obtain a representative embedding. The second strategy, referred to as Multi-GWMDS, adopts a selection-based paradigm in which multiple geometry-consistent candidate embeddings are generated via GW-based alignment and a representative embedding is selected. Experiments on synthetic manifolds and real-world datasets show that the proposed methods effectively preserve intrinsic relational structure across views. These results highlight GW-based approaches as a flexible and principled framework for multi-view representation learning.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manifold embedding correlation | Electricity Load Diagrams (ELD) | Correlation (View 1)0.4814 | 7 | |
| Manifold embedding | S-curve (view 1) | Correlation0.8484 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | S-curve (view 2) | Correlation0.9334 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | S-curve (mean) | Correlation0.8542 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | Swiss Roll (view 2) | Correlation0.9289 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | Swiss Roll (mean) | Correlation0.8575 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | Mobius (view 2) | Correlation0.966 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | Mobius (mean) | Correlation (mean)0.9437 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | Torus (view 2) | Correlation0.9431 | 5 | |
| Manifold embedding | Torus (mean) | Correlation0.8127 | 5 |