ConsistRM: Improving Generative Reward Models via Consistency-Aware Self-Training
About
Generative reward models (GRMs) have emerged as a promising approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences by offering greater representational capacity and flexibility than traditional scalar reward models. However, GRMs face two major challenges: reliance on costly human-annotated data restricts scalability, and self-training approaches often suffer from instability and vulnerability to reward hacking. To address these issues, we propose ConsistRM, a self-training framework that enables effective and stable GRM training without human annotations. ConsistRM incorporates the Consistency-Aware Answer Reward, which produces reliable pseudo-labels with temporal consistency, thereby providing more stable model optimization. Moreover, the Consistency-Aware Critique Reward is introduced to assess semantic consistency across multiple critiques and allocates fine-grained and differentiated rewards. Experiments on five benchmark datasets across four base models demonstrate that ConsistRM outperforms vanilla Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) by an average of 1.5%. Further analysis shows that ConsistRM enhances output consistency and mitigates position bias caused by input order, highlighting the effectiveness of consistency-aware rewards in improving GRMs.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reward Modeling | RewardBench | Accuracy85.6 | 166 | |
| Reward Modeling | RM-Bench | Accuracy78.3 | 125 | |
| Reward Modeling | RMB | Accuracy79.1 | 120 | |
| Reward Modeling | JudgeBench | Accuracy56.9 | 105 | |
| Reward Modeling | PPE Pref | Accuracy67.7 | 15 | |
| Reward Modeling | Overall 5-Benchmark Suite | Average Score73.5 | 12 |