Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

EditCaption: Human-Refined SFT and HAE-DPO for Image Editing Instruction Synthesis

About

High-quality source-target image pairs with precise editing instructions are essential for instruction-guided image editing, yet constructing such training triplets at scale remains costly. Recent pipelines often rely on vision-language models to synthesize editing instructions automatically, but we find that strong VLMs still struggle to describe visual transformations between image pairs. In particular, they exhibit three recurring failure modes: orientation inconsistency, viewpoint ambiguity, and missing fine-grained attributes. In a human evaluation on 400 image pairs, several open-source VLM baselines produce critical-error rates above 47\%, making many synthesized instructions unsuitable for downstream training. To address this, we propose EditCaption, a two-stage post-training pipeline for image editing instruction synthesis. First, we construct a 100K supervised fine-tuning dataset through GLM-based auto-captioning, EditScore filtering, and human refinement. Second, we collect 10K human-annotated preference pairs, where each rejected instruction is labeled with its primary error type and severity. Based on this dataset, we propose Hardness-Adaptive Error-Aware DPO (HAE-DPO), a task-adapted DPO objective that introduces an adaptive margin based on human-labeled severity, failure-mode type, and reference-model hardness. Experiments across three benchmarks demonstrate that our 235B model with SFT+HAE-DPO achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source and closed models, scoring 4.720 on Eval-400, 4.672 on HQ-Edit, and 4.651 on ByteMorph-Bench -- surpassing Gemini-3-Pro on all three. Human evaluation confirms critical error rates drop from 47.75\% to 17.50\%, with correct rates improving from 41.75\% to 70.25\%, surpassing Gemini-3-Pro (66.00\%).

Xiangyuan Wang, Honghao Cai, Yunhao Bai, Chao Hui, Tianze Zhou, Haohua Chen, Hao Shi, Yuling Wu, Yao Hu, Xu Tang, Yibo Chen, Wei Zhu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Instruction Synthesis for Image EditingEval-400 In-house
S Score4.712
11
Instruction Synthesis for Image EditingByteMorph-Bench
S Score4.588
11
Instruction Synthesis for Image EditingHQ-Edit
Synthesis Quality (S)4.63
11
Instruction GenerationEval-400 In-house (test)
Correctness66
7
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update