Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

SMFormer: Empowering Self-supervised Stereo Matching via Foundation Models and Data Augmentation

About

Recent self-supervised stereo matching methods have made significant progress. They typically rely on the photometric consistency assumption, which presumes corresponding points across views share the same appearance. However, this assumption could be compromised by real-world disturbances, resulting in invalid supervisory signals and a significant accuracy gap compared to supervised methods. To address this issue, we propose SMFormer, a framework integrating more reliable self-supervision guided by the Vision Foundation Model (VFM) and data augmentation. We first incorporate the VFM with the Feature Pyramid Network (FPN), providing a discriminative and robust feature representation against disturbance in various scenarios. We then devise an effective data augmentation mechanism that ensures robustness to various transformations. The data augmentation mechanism explicitly enforces consistency between learned features and those influenced by illumination variations. Additionally, it regularizes the output consistency between disparity predictions of strong augmented samples and those generated from standard samples. Experiments on multiple mainstream benchmarks demonstrate that our SMFormer achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance among self-supervised methods and even competes on par with supervised ones. Remarkably, in the challenging Booster benchmark, SMFormer even outperforms some SOTA supervised methods, such as CFNet.

Yun Wang, Zhengjie Yang, Jiahao Zheng, Zhanjie Zhang, Dapeng Oliver Wu, Yulan Guo• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Stereo MatchingKITTI 2015 (test)
D1 Error (Overall)3.68
205
Stereo MatchingKITTI 2015--
118
Stereo MatchingKITTI 2012
Error Rate (3px, All)4.1
108
Stereo MatchingKITTI 2012 (test)--
89
Stereo MatchingETH3D
Threshold Error > 1px (Noc)2.9
50
Stereo MatchingMiddlebury (test)--
47
Stereo MatchingMiddlebury
Bad Pixel Rate (Thresh 2.0)8.1
42
Stereo MatchingETH3D (test)
Error Rate (Th=1.0)3.54
34
Stereo MatchingDrivingStereo--
14
Stereo MatchingDrivingStereo weather
D1 Error3.2
9
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update