Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Acceleration

About

Recently, scaling reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models (LLMs) has emerged as an effective training paradigm for significantly improving model capabilities, which requires guiding the model to perform extensive exploration and learning, leading to substantial computational overhead and becoming a key challenge. To reduce the number of training steps, Prior work performs linear extrapolation of model parameters. However, the dynamics of model parameter updates during RLVR training remain insufficiently understood. To further investigate the evolution of LLMs during RLVR training, we conduct empirical experiments and find that the rank-1 subspace of the model does not evolve linearly, and its dominance over the original parameters is further amplified during LoRA training. Based on the above insights, we propose the \textbf{N}onlinear \textbf{Ext}rapolation of low-rank trajectories (\textbf{NExt}), a novel framework that models and extrapolates low-rank parameter trajectories in a nonlinear manner. Concretely, we first train the model using LoRA and extract the rank-1 subspace of parameter differences at multiple training steps, which is then used for the subsequent nonlinear extrapolation. Afterward, we utilized the extracted rank-1 subspace to train a predictor, which can model the trajectory of parameter updates during RLVR, and then perform the predict-extend process to extrapolate model parameters, achieving the acceleration of RLVR. To further study and understand NExt, we conduct comprehensive experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the method. Our method reduces computational overhead by approximately 37.5\% while remaining compatible with a wide range of RLVR algorithms and tasks. We release our code in https://github.com/RUCAIBox/NExt.

Zhipeng Chen, Tao Qian, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningAIME 2024
Accuracy17.9
104
Mathematical ReasoningMinerva
Accuracy (Acc)30.5
62
Multi-task Language UnderstandingMMLU Pro (test)
History Score65.1
20
Multiple-choice Question AnsweringMMLU-Pro
Biology Accuracy82.6
20
Mathematical ReasoningMathematical Reasoning Tasks AMC23 Minerva
AMC23 Score43.1
16
Mathematical ReasoningOlymMATH
Accuracy9.3
16
Mathematical ReasoningAggregate Mathematical Tasks (AIME24/25, AMC23, Minerva, OlymMATH)
Average Score28.3
16
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update