Solving Physics Olympiad via Reinforcement Learning on Physics Simulators
About
We have witnessed remarkable advances in LLM reasoning capabilities with the advent of DeepSeek-R1. However, much of this progress has been fueled by the abundance of internet question-answer (QA) pairs, a major bottleneck going forward, since such data is limited in scale and concentrated mainly in domains like mathematics. In contrast, other sciences such as physics lack large-scale QA datasets to effectively train reasoning-capable models. In this work, we show that physics simulators can serve as a powerful alternative source of supervision for training LLMs for physical reasoning. We generate random scenes in physics engines, create synthetic question-answer pairs from simulated interactions, and train LLMs using reinforcement learning on this synthetic data. Our models exhibit zero-shot sim-to-real transfer to real-world physics benchmarks: for example, training solely on synthetic simulated data improves performance on IPhO (International Physics Olympiad) problems by 5-10 percentage points across model sizes. These results demonstrate that physics simulators can act as scalable data generators, enabling LLMs to acquire deep physical reasoning skills beyond the limitations of internet-scale QA data. Code available at: https://sim2reason.github.io/.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physics Reasoning | Synthetic Numeric | Accuracy21.9 | 10 | |
| Physics Reasoning | Synthetic Symbolic | Accuracy10.4 | 10 | |
| Physics Reasoning | HCV | Accuracy59 | 10 | |
| Physics Reasoning | IPhO Mechanics | Accuracy40 | 10 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH 500 | Average Accuracy82.8 | 6 | |
| Question Answering | IPhO | IPhO Accuracy40 | 4 | |
| Mathematical & Scientific Reasoning | OlympiadBench | Mean Accuracy44.53 | 2 | |
| Physics Reasoning | Physics | Mean Accuracy43.09 | 2 | |
| Scientific Reasoning | JEEBench | Mean Accuracy52.28 | 2 |