Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Aligning What Vision-Language Models See and Perceive with Adaptive Information Flow

About

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capability in a wide range of tasks such as visual recognition, document parsing, and visual grounding. Nevertheless, recent work shows that while VLMs often manage to capture the correct image region corresponding to the question, they do not necessarily produce the correct answers. In this work, we demonstrate that this misalignment could be attributed to suboptimal information flow within VLMs, where text tokens distribute too much attention to irrelevant visual tokens, leading to incorrect answers. Based on the observation, we show that modulating the information flow during inference can improve the perception capability of VLMs. The idea is that text tokens should only be associated with important visual tokens during decoding, eliminating the interference of irrelevant regions. To achieve this, we propose a token dynamics-based method to determine the importance of visual tokens, where visual tokens that exhibit distinct activation patterns during different decoding stages are viewed as important. We apply our approach to representative open-source VLMs and evaluate on various datasets, including visual question answering, visual grounding and counting, optical character recognition, and object hallucination. The results show that our approach significantly improves the performance of baselines. Project page: https://cxliu0.github.io/AIF/.

Chengxin Liu, Wonseok Choi, Chenshuang Zhang, Tae-Hyun Oh• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy89.5
2019
Visual GroundingRefCOCO+ (val)
Accuracy86.6
253
Visual GroundingRefCOCO+ (testA)
Accuracy91
245
Visual GroundingRefCOCO+ (testB)
Accuracy80.5
219
Visual GroundingRefCOCO (val)
Accuracy91.6
172
Visual GroundingRefCOCO (testA)
Accuracy94.2
162
Visual GroundingRefCOCO (testB)
Accuracy88.4
159
Visual GroundingRefCOCOg (val)
Accuracy89.3
158
Visual GroundingRefCOCOg (test)
Accuracy89.7
155
CountingCountBench
Accuracy89.5
102
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update